Model Parameters
Cheyette Volatility & Reversion
Nelson-Siegel Market Curve \(f(0, T)\)
European Swaption Details
Monte Carlo Controls
--
----
Root where Swap NPV = 0--
Accumulated Variance--
\(t_{1/2} = \ln(2)/\kappa\)--
\(\sigma^2 / (2\kappa)\)--
MC vs Exact DiscrepancyDisplays instantaneous forward curves \(f(t_0, t_0 + \tau)\) under neutral state \((x=0)\) and \(\pm 2\sigma_x\) interest rate shocks. Notice the upward convexity bend caused by the deterministic auxiliary variance \(y(t_0)\).
Jamshidian (1989) decomposition breaks the payer swaption into a weighted portfolio of European put options on individual zero-coupon bonds. Bars indicate basis point contribution to total swaption value; points indicate critical strikes \(K_i\).
Monte Carlo simulation of the Markovian short rate \(r(t) = f(0, t) + x(t)\) showing the median path and 5th-95th percentile envelopes across 500 stochastic paths.
Institutional Sensitivity Matrices
Mean Reversion \(\kappa\) vs Volatility \(\sigma\) on Swaption (bps)
| \(\kappa \backslash \sigma\) | 0.6% | 1.0% | 1.4% | 1.8% | 2.4% |
|---|
Expiry \(T_0\) vs Tenor on Convexity Bias (bps)
| \(T_0 \backslash \text{Tenor}\) | 1.0Y | 2.0Y | 5.0Y | 7.0Y | 10.0Y |
|---|
Institutional Framework & Mathematical Derivations
1. The Heath-Jarrow-Morton (1992) Path Dependency Dilemma
In the continuous Heath-Jarrow-Morton (1992) framework, the instantaneous forward rate for maturity \(T\) follows the stochastic differential equation:
Under the risk-neutral martingale measure \(\mathbb{Q}\), no-arbitrage uniquely fixes the drift \(\alpha(t, T)\) to:
Integrating over time reveals that the forward rate \(f(t, T) = f(0, T) + \int_0^t \alpha(s, T) ds + \int_0^t \sigma(s, T) dW(s)\) depends on the entire historical path of Brownian increments across the continuum of maturities. Consequently, general HJM models are infinite-dimensional and non-Markovian: evaluating path-dependent options (such as Bermudan swaptions) requires simulating the entire forward curve at every time step, creating severe computational bottlenecks.
2. The Cheyette (1992) Separable Volatility Breakthrough
Oren Cheyette (1992) discovered that if the volatility structure \(\sigma(t, T)\) factorizes into an exponential separable kernel:
where \(\kappa > 0\) is the constant mean-reversion parameter and \(\sigma(t) = \sigma\), the continuous continuum of forward rates collapses into an exact 2-dimensional Markov diffusion process governed by state variables \((x(t), y(t))\):
Here, \(x(t)\) represents the stochastic deviation of the short rate from the initial market forward rate, while \(y(t)\) represents the deterministic accumulated variance and convexity adjustment:
3. Exact Zero-Coupon Bond Pricing & Instantaneous Forward Rates
With the state variables \((x(t), y(t))\) established, zero-coupon bond prices \(P(t, T)\) are given in exact closed form without numerical integration:
where \(G(t, T) = \frac{1 - e^{-\kappa(T - t)}}{\kappa}\). Notice that at time \(t = 0\), since \(x(0) = 0\) and \(y(0) = 0\), the exponential equals 1, meaning that Cheyette identically fits any arbitrary market yield curve \(P^M(0, T)\) by construction.
The corresponding instantaneous forward rate curve is:
4. Jamshidian (1989) Exact European Swaption Decomposition
Because zero-coupon bond prices \(P(T_0, T_i; x(T_0), y(T_0))\) are strictly monotonic decreasing functions of the single random factor \(x(T_0)\), Farshid Jamshidian's (1989) decomposition theorem applies. At swaption expiry \(T_0\), the payer swaption payoff is:
where \(c_i = K_{\text{swap}} \Delta t\) for \(i < n\) and \(c_n = 1 + K_{\text{swap}} \Delta t\). By solving for the unique root \(x^*\) such that:
each bond strike is defined as \(K_i = P(T_0, T_i; x^*, y(T_0))\). The swaption decomposes into an exact portfolio of European zero-coupon bond put options:
Cheyette Model Mastery Quiz
1. What mathematical property allows Cheyette (1992) to collapse the infinite-dimensional HJM forward curve into a 2D Markovian state space?
2. What economic and mathematical quantity does the auxiliary state variable \(y(t)\) represent?
3. How does the Cheyette model value European swaptions in closed form without two-dimensional numerical quadrature?
4. Why does the Cheyette model fit the initial market term structure \(P^M(0, T)\) identically without calibration error?