Institutional Valuation Presets
Select an institutional corporate profile to prefill forecast cash flows, hurdle rates, and exit parameters.
Step 1: Discrete Forecast & Terminal Parameters
Valuation Inputs & Exit Assumptions
Step 2: Valuation Reconciliations & Enterprise Value Bridge
Terminal Valuation & DCF Bridge Summary
| Valuation Component | Gordon Growth Model ($g = 2.50\%$) | Exit Multiple Method ($9.00\text{x}$) | Variance / Spread ($) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PV of Discrete 5-Year Cash Flows | $28,500,000 | $28,500,000 | $0 |
| Terminal Year Cash Flow Basis | Year 5 FCF: $8,200,000 | Year 5 EBITDA: $12,500,000 | — |
| Nominal Terminal Value at $t=5$ | $120,071,429 | $112,500,000 | -$7,571,429 (-6.3%) |
| Present Value Factor ($(1 + \text{WACC})^{-5}$) | 0.6353 | 0.6353 | — |
| Discounted Present Value of Terminal Value | $76,281,424 | $71,466,543 | -$4,814,881 |
| Total Enterprise Value (TEV) | $104,781,424 | $99,966,543 | -$4,814,881 (-4.6%) |
| Terminal Value % of Total Enterprise Value | 72.80% | 71.49% | -1.31% |
| Cross-Model Reconciled Growth / Multiple | Implied Exit Multiple: 9.61x | Implied Perpetuity Rate: 2.04% | Economic Alignment High |
Step 3: Multi-Variable Valuation Sensitivity Matrices
WACC vs. Perpetuity Growth ($g$) & Exit Multiple Stress Tests
Perpetuity Model TEV ($M): WACC vs. Long-Term Growth Rate ($g$)
Total Enterprise Value ($M) across varying discount rates (columns) and perpetuity growth rates (rows).
Exit Multiple TEV ($M): WACC vs. Exit EV/EBITDA Multiple
Total Enterprise Value ($M) across varying discount rates (columns) and exit EBITDA multiples (rows).
Corporate Finance Methodology
Terminal Value Valuation Formulas & Cross-Model Mechanics
1. Gordon Growth Model (Perpetuity Growth)
The Gordon Growth Model assumes free cash flows grow in perpetuity at a constant rate $g$, discounted back at the corporate cost of capital ($\text{WACC}$):
Constraint: The perpetual growth rate $g$ must be strictly less than $\text{WACC}$. In real-world institutional underwriting, $g$ should never exceed long-term sustainable nominal GDP growth (2.0% – 3.5%).
2. Exit Multiple Method & Implied Growth Solver
The Exit Multiple Method benchmarks the terminal value against current peer transaction multiples applied to the final projected EBITDA:
Institutional Cross-Check: By setting the Exit Multiple Terminal Value equal to the Gordon Growth formula, we algebraically solve for the implied perpetuity growth rate. If an exit multiple implies $g > 4.5\%$, the exit assumption is aggressive and risks multiple expansion bias.
Frequently Asked Questions